As we wrap up 2011, Trulia’s Chief Economist looks ahead at what’s in store for the battered housing market and which cities have a big reason to celebrate the New Year.
My crystal ball is never as crystal-clear as I’d like, but I do think that we can expect a gradual economic recovery to move the housing market a few steps back toward normal in 2012.
Before getting into the predictions, let me be upfront about what I’m assuming. After 14 months of job gains, I expect the economy to continue its slow but determined recovery. I don’t do my own macroeconomic forecasts, but every single one of the fifty-ish economic forecasters surveyed by the Wall Street Journal expects the economy to grow throughout 2012, and that makes sense to me.
Here’s what I expect in 2012 and what it means for agents:
Delinquencies will go down, but foreclosures will go up.
Fewer borrowers will fall behind on their payments next year, thanks to the strengthening economy and refinancings. The share of delinquent borrowers is already down more than a quarter from the peak a couple of years ago. But many borrowers who fell behind on their payments during the housing crisis are still in limbo: last year’s robo-signing controversy threw a wrench in the gears of the foreclosure process. That means that some delinquent loans haven’t yet gone through the foreclosure process. Once a settlement is reached with banks over robo-signing, we’ll see a new wave of foreclosures and foreclosure sales.
What it means for agents: Despite the decline in delinquencies, the wave of foreclosures will hurt. New foreclosures will depress prices for several reasons – foreclosed homes are often sold at a discount and used as comps for non-distressed homes; vacant homes bring down the value of their neighbors; and high foreclosures are the worst thing for consumer confidence in the housing market. That will hurt seller motivation even more than buyer motivation since lower prices will mean deals for some buyers. Agents should be gearing up with competitive pricing strategies to catch buyers and preparing to counsel their traditional seller-clients about the depressed prices to come in high-foreclosure areas.
Rents will rise – which is a bad thing.
With fewer people buying homes and more people losing their homes to foreclosures, rental demand is increasing. High rents will hold back economic growth if businesses can’t pay workers enough to have a roof over their heads. Squeezed city-dwellers won’t get relief until late 2012: that’s when a wave of new multi-unit construction projects that started late this year will be completed and available for rent. To tackle growth-killing high living costs in the priciest cities head on, local governments need to get rid of height restrictions and arduous permitting processes, which hold back urban construction and push development to the suburbs.
What it means for agents: Rising rents and falling prices make buying a great deal – but only for prospective buyers who can afford the downpayment and qualify for a mortgage. When counseling buyers, agents need to be aware of the struggle and sacrifice required to save for down payments in this climate. But the good news is that there will be clients motivated by available inventory and low prices – even though these clients may require more hand-holding around financing options.
Mortgage rates will inch up – which will probably be a good thing.
A stronger economy will push Treasury bonds and mortgage rates up because inflation becomes more likely and investors demand higher rates to hold bonds. But lots of factors can push rates up or down. For the housing market, which direction rates go is less important than why. Gradual economic recovery is good news for the housing market even if it means higher mortgage rates – because higher mortgage rates should go hand-in-hand with greater housing demand.
What it means for agents: Higher mortgage rates mean higher monthly payments for buyers, but a stronger economy means that buyers will be better able to afford those rates. Higher rates probably won’t hold back buyers much: rates are only one of many factors that enter into the cost of buying a home, and for many buyers the downpayment is a much bigger barrier to homeownership than the monthly payments. Also, buyers need to be reminded that homeownership has other costs on top of the monthly mortgage payment, like insurance and maintenance, which can add half again as much to the cost of owning a home. Agents should help buyers figure out the overall costs and benefits of homeownership, not just the monthly mortgage payment.
Government will sit on its hands.
In election years, politicians don’t take risks: they’re more talk and less action, so don’t expect any bold housing policy reforms next year. What’s more, with the housing market now recovering, we’re not in enough of a crisis to force political opponents together. Instead, in 2012 we’ll see the effects of modest housing proposals from this year: easier refinancing under the expanded HARP program, and more government-owned homes coming to market for sale or rent. But the bitter debate in Washington over the budget deficit and debt will continue.
What it means for agents: No news may be good news: I don’t expect major changes in policy that will upend the housing market. But government is slowly scaling back support for housing, both to encourage the private sector to come back in and also to help deal with the federal budget deficit. Late this year we saw increased fees on Fannie and Freddie to help fund the payroll tax cut, lower conforming loan limits, and proposals to scale back mortgage interest deduction. Agents should explain to buyers what these changes means for their mortgage costs, both before and after taxes.
Smart cities are hot.
In 2012, the local housing markets that will enjoy rising prices, new construction or both, are those that start the year with stronger job growth and fewer empty homes holding back the market. My top five cities to watch are Austin TX, Houston TX, San Jose CA, the Boston suburbs, and Rochester NY. Most of these cities have strong high-tech industries or high-skill workforces. During the housing boom, the go-go cities tended to be lower-skill, lower-education metros. But in 2012, smart is hot.
What it means for agents: All markets are local. Even though the housing bubble and bust affected nearly all markets, each local market is recovering – or not – at its own pace. National indicators are helpful in understanding where the market is going overall, but buyers and sellers need to understand what’s happening in your local market – which could be very different from the national picture.


![Agent_Guide_Sold_Listings_239x319[2]](http://pro.truliablog.com/files/2012/05/Agent_Guide_Sold_Listings_239x3192.gif)








Legacy Comments
This article is just what I myself have been predicting about the real estate market.
Donna you are living in bubble, are you working Realtor?
Really? And exactly where do you get your “expert” insight Donna?
Are you a statistician? An actuary? An economist?
Wow, the haters are coming out in force.
What’s smart about Rochester, NY? Kodak is ready to go belly up. What’s smart about Houston? NASA is being de-funded by the same Congress that caused this housing mess in the first place. With a shrinking workforce predicted in these cities by anyone who reads the news, how are these two cities going to grow?
My thoughts exactly. What is this author talking about? People will be leaving these areas, further depressing real estate there.
Can’t speak about NY but Houston is full of oil and gas technology, computer tech., and plenty other smart businesses. Almost everyone I know works for 1 of the top 10 oil companies. NASA never crosses my mind, but there is many defense contractor companies in Houston too. Northrop Gru. , BAE, etc… The only people I know without a good career either is in school, retired, or just taking a break. If NASA leaves a private tech company will jump in it’s spot.
Houston is not a one stop shop city. Houston is as diverse as it gets. Oil corporations, largest medical center in the world, Port of Houston, along with many High Tech companies. The cost of affordable living and housing tops the list. Being the 4th largest city in US doesn’t hurt either.We are ready for the shift along with expected Changes ahead.
well Houstons economy is higly diversified with energy, high tech, and much more. While NASA closing is a bruise on the Clear Lake area and supporting companies, the city’s other industries have allowed the area over a 4% increase in housing. Houston is strong and we are enjoying a fairly good recovery
In response to the predictions. I believe the economy will not get better for the middle class but for the big corporations and multi millionaires it will be great with the tax breaks and incentives. The housing market will continue to get worse and possibly be worse than 2008. With the amount of pre foreclosures, bankruptcy laws, short sales and the ro bo signing mess how can you think it will stabilize. Be prepared and put on your seat belt. My book on short sales and the mortgage crisis will be out soon.
Offhand, it would seem like my area – Orange County, California – should be in the top 5 or 10 of your “smart cities”. We have a LOT of technology in this community.
I find this vacuous report indicative of the effectiveness of the association lobbyists and management we MUST pay dearly for NOTHING! The assumptions (with no substantiation data) are false. There has been no growth. In fact our GDP has shrunk by .8% this year. The government has changed how they count unemployed, so this author is also wrong that there is job growth. There are fewer workers now getting a paycheck. Employment is DOWN.
There are new taxes taking effect soon on real estate transactions thanks to Obamacare. The last data I saw showed 22% of the homeowners in the country are under water. WHAT!!!!!! That’s huge! This is the biggest economic collapse ever in world history. What is our powerful lobby doing to stop it? Socialist government is just plain BAD for our future. We should be bold and go to the root of the problem instead of “feeding the alligators” on both sides to maintain our line of communication. We are rearranging the deck chairs as the Titanic is sinking. We (NAR and FAR)actually gave money to Debby Wasserman Shultz! Take the side of the Constitution an our future! Tell NAR and FAR to stop aiding the enemy of our small businesses. YOU are PAYING for our demise.
Chris you are right on the money. Way to many people are unaware of the matters you mention particularly the fact that the government has come up with new math regarding the workers. Listen to the news reports that have stated that we have lost 2 million jobs that will never come back. How many of those went off shore and are now working for Chinas? Then there is the matter of all is well. well at least until we find out if there is going to be a catastrophy in Europe and how about that national budghet we have not had for nigh unto 3 years. The numbers we will be seeing this year will not be real and do not forget that. When you have a president who wants to lower the FICA/Social Security tax to give a tax break to the common man of $1000 per year who is at the same time taking money out of the Social Security Fund and paying for it with fees on mortgages–well that is not going to be good for real estate.Keep in mind that the $1000 bonus will be taxed. Oh, and lets not forget that he is going to give seniors a 3.5% COLA this year. Add to this the fact that the only three areas seeing an increse in building, Washington DC, Seattle and Portland, Oregon, and I tell you you need to get involved in the removal of the Hawaiian vacation president and all of his cronies in both the Democrat and Republican parties. Time to saddle up and move’em out.
Spot on Chris. The RE industry is completely out of touch with reality.
Both on a social and number oriented basis. Shills and carpet salesmen cheerleading, because quite frankly, that is all they can do. It is a self-serving business. Without SALES, there is virtually no business. This creates a BIASED POV and mindset.
There is no non-partisan economic analysis of RE from within. As a former appraiser
and agent for about 2 years, I can see first hand how most agents have little to no understanding of the numbers and economic drivers behind real estate and broader macro factors that influence micro markets. part of it is the education requirements themselves. Which are very weak. But most agents do not bother to go the extra mile and learn about economics (beyond the very simplistic Demand-Supply model)
And Bush planned 9/11, the moon landing was faked, and the CIA killed Kennedy. The world will end in 2012 anyway so what’s the point, right Chris. I love guys who profess to have the “real data” because they read it on a blog.
spot on comment
No one could have said it plainer than you.
There isn’t any recovery going on. There isn’t any growth in the job market. Housing prices are generally still droping and peoples incomes are not able to buy as much today as last year – food prices are up, energy prices are up, and incomes are flat.
Until the current incumbent is replaced along with his nefarious cronies, nothing is going to change.
You really need to look outside the box. Florida’s Treasure Coast specificqally Port Saint Lucie, is already showing increasing prices and homes are getting into bidding wars. Most buyers who don’t want the wait and hassle of short sales are finding homes difficult at best.
not every area has been affected identically. however, even well performing areas have declined in prices some, and may get much worse if surrounding devastation is ignored. we see you’re observation right here in the SF bay area in CA. SF, San Mateo, even Marin and Santa Clara counties haven’t fallen nearly as far as the other 7 counties, and may never be as bad as some, but to justify doing nothing for the devastated areas because “my area isn’t so bad” is risky and short-sighted. cj
this prediction is like my following fantasy:
i threw a sharp object out into the yard in the middle of the night when it was pitch dark and predicted that it would hit a bird
Why is no one talking about how the IRS mortgage debt forgiveness act expiring will affect this market? Right now there are hardly any consequences for people who let their home go into foreclosure or short sale. They get rid of the house and then if it was their primary residence – they don’t have to pay taxes on the 1099 they get from the bank. This IRS mortgage debt relief act is expiring the end of 2012. How will this impact the economy? There will actually consequences again for people who let their house go. I am actually hoping they don’t extend this. If they do – more and more people will just keep letting them go because they are so upside down – and that will just drag this out to let us hit bottom! If they don’t extend this – than any house that goes back to the bank after Jan. 1, 2013 can expect to get a 1099 in 2014 and if they don’t have the money to pay on the taxes of a Ex. $100,000 1099 – then the IRS can garnish their wages. I think when that hits the media – you will see a few less people walking away. I hate to say it – but we need consequences for people walkign away and I certainly hope they don’t extend this tax credit!
Why is no one talking about how the IRS mortgage debt forgiveness act expiring will affect this market? Right now there are hardly any consequences for people who let their home go into foreclosure or short sale. They get rid of the house and then if it was their primary residence – they don’t have to pay taxes on the 1099 they get from the bank. This IRS mortgage debt relief act is expiring the end of 2012. How will this impact the economy? There will actually consequences again for people who let their house go. I am actually hoping they don’t extend this. If they do – more and more people will just keep letting them go because they are so upside down – and that will just drag this out to let us hit bottom! If they don’t extend this – than any house that goes back to the bank after Jan. 1, 2013 can expect to get a 1099 in 2014 and if they don’t have the money to pay on the taxes of a Ex. $100,000 1099 – then the IRS can garnish their wages. I think when that hits the media – you will see a few less people walking away. I hate to say it – but we need consequences for people walking away and I certainly hope they don’t extend this tax credit!
Christy – what planet are you from? People who are loosing their homes are not doing so out of choice, its because they can’t make the current payment and can’t refinance, and the mortgage holder won’t modify their loan.
If you want to hit bottom, then require all of the banks to release to the open market all of the properties they have that have been foreclosed upon but are being held back by the banks. The consequences for the people is: 200 point drop in credit score or more, can’t buy another home for at least 3 years, and have to rent in a landlord market. What you fail to understand is the 1099 problem. If the homeowner has a 300,000 mortgage and has to see their home as a short sale for 150000, then they are being taxed on the difference of 150000 as imputed income at the current tax rate of 150000 as if they actually received that money.
punishing homeowners who purchased in 2009 and are now 50% underwater is not the answer to solving this horrible mess. We MUST get the banks to change their two rules so the market can be “reset” without more devastation. Please refer to http://www.occupy-our-homes.info for details of which rules to get banks to change, how that will work, and why it will work. This is going to turn into one of the major themes of Occupy andI’m working hard to bring to the public. cj
Sorry, but a short sale is the only thing that will get taxed if the mortgage forgiveness expires. If the home goes back to the bank then it is a foreclosure and up to the bank to try and recoup their losses. A homeowner doing a short sale is better for the prices then a bank selling the home as a foreclosure.
I predict . . .
You’re wrong on at least two of the predictions: (1) Delinquencies will go down, but foreclosures will go up, and (2) Government will sit on its hands.
Remember: It’s an election year. “Government will sit on its hands” even acknowledges that, but comes to the wrong conclusion. Those in office want to stay in office at all costs. And a rise in foreclosures would mean bad news for incumbents . . . Democrats and Republicans. No, those in power don’t want bad news. Even the most conservative Tea Party Republican and the most liberal Occupy Wall Street Democrat wouldn’t benefit by growing constituent discontent. They’ll figure out a way to keep foreclosures down until after the elections. For incumbents, it’s a matter of survival, pure and simple.
So, what will they do? Lots of smoke and mirrors. What will come out of Washington won’t look like “modest proposals.” It’ll look big and bold. Admittedly, Democrats and Republicans will want to advance different ideas. But the Republicans–handcuffed by Grover Norquist and the Tea Party–can’t go along with even a modest expansion of government programs . . . at least not without the money to pay for them . . . but with their “no new taxes” pledge there’s no way to boost revenue in order to strengthen any existing programs. And that means any program the Democrats would propose that would cost an extra penny would be a “non-starter.”
You won’t see any program that would impose additional costs on the banks, either. The Republicans would yell that you’d be hurting the “job creators.” Meanwhile, take a look at where Obama’s getting a lot of his contributions. Banks and Wall Street.
Honestly, it’s difficult for me to imagine what Congress will come up with. But I’m absolutely sure it’ll come up with something that’ll look like it’s taking bold, decisive steps to address the housing problems. Something that will pump even more money into the banks with the “expectation” that real beneficiaries will be homeowners. Maybe by reducing or phasing out the payroll tax cuts and directing the “savings” to the banks.
You just watch.
The total key to whether we have a recovery is directly dependent on whether the half of the country who put the Neighborhood rabble rouser Lib Dem ole barry in office to further Destroy our Great country, have Finally come to their senses! IF we vote him and his Lib Dems OUT, we will have a recovery, IF not then the Wanton Spending, Exorbitant Tax and Spending, Job Killing Taxes and Regulations, Reckless Class Warfare Middle Class Destruction will continue and Job Loss,Foreclosures, Rampant Inflation will continue Unabated! IF this happens we will ALL pay Dearly for their Ignorance! Barry’s Lib Dem Cronies, Frank and Dodd, who Caused this MESS are gone, but their Blatant Stupidity lives on and we will continue to pay the Great consequences, and if the Lib Dems who Caused this MESS are not voted OUT, our future generations will Also Pay Dearly for their Despicable actions!!
Hi David,
I think Houston and the entire state of Texas is very smart about getting tech and other manufacturing jobs into their state. I say this as a Silicon Valley agent specializing in the Greater Palo Alto area and San Jose. I also think that we see a huge influx of mainland Chinese Buyers in our area. They also feel comfortable in the Houston metro area. International money is funding a significant portion of our market, which is HOT right now.
When I hold a home open in Palo Alto more than half of the people looking at the home are Asian nationals from all over Asia and India. I don’t know anyting about Rochester, but I do know that RIT is there…..Kodak, such a great company that did not keep up with the times.
With a due respect to Mr. Kolko, yet another “expert” delivering a very flawed very biased article. With one glaring exception, his projections are nowhere near correct. He is spot on, congress will do as it has for the past three years, sit on its hands and do as the financial lobbies demand, nothing. There can nor will be any real sustainable economic recovery until real estate is AT LEAST stabilized… and that can ONLY occur through a properly designed and implemented loan modification program… There are some 20 plus million homes with negative equity… and that number is continuing to grow with each monthly report. Assuming that the slide ended today, using the HUD actuarial data, it will take at least until 2022 to break even…
The following are my Cliff Notes for a proposal that will accomplish a stabilized real estate market; and halt the continued plummeting of the related real estate tax revenues to the states
1. Lenders write down loans to fair market value.
2. Using existing loan loss guaranty formulae, federal government reimburses lenders for write down, plus an offset for the balance.
3. Additional bonus to lenders in the form of an easing of the loan loss reserve requirements on every loan modified. Caveat being the funds must be funded into new loans. “Loan it or Lose it.”
4. Homeowners waive the mortgage interest deduction as the means for repaying the treasury.
5. Real estate taxes to be reset to the date of the original loan.
read my blog (http://stanbrody.blogspot.com/) for additional details and irrefutable data…
Finally, the real point is addressed. Millions of people who want to move are upside-down in their homes. If they do a short sale, they cannot buy for 2+ years. If they bring cash to closing, they have no money to buy.
More than 1/2 of all buyers have a home first to sell, and this is why demand is so low right now. The buyers are trapped and cannot move.
Stan, how about a “short sale amnesty” program that will allow a non-recourse short sale, with no deficiency judgment or note, and no credit impact that will allow for immediate purchase (must be current on mortgage payments to apply).
This would rocket the trapped buyers right into the market and get things rolling along. The banks are losing more money under current conditions than they would just booking the losses and moving forward.
I agree! The banks are the winning at this game. This is monopoly 101. If they have the property and all the money how can the general public win? They need to take the losses cause they certainly took the gains and let us move on!
Joe,
Great idea. I think you are right.
All,
I’m real sad to see so many rough people commenting on here. We are supposed to be professionals and work together in this industry. I’m ashamed of some of you being so rude to one another.
Best of luck to all of you. It’s a bit of a tough time. Hang in there.
Good analysis Stan. Glad you can see through the BIAS.
please help me get everyone demanding the banks change their 2 rules that will stop the market devastation in those geographic areas that really need this help: http://www.occupy-our-homes.info. These changes will keep people in their homes, stop the massive foreclosures and short sales, allow buyers to sell without having to sell “short”, and bring back a normal market to our real estate. We owe this to ourselves and have to unite to demand these changes loud enough to be heard. cj
I agree with everything the good Professor says, with one exception: he said “foreclosed homes are often sold at a discount and used as comps for non-distressed homes; vacant homes bring down the value of their neighbors…”
I’ve been in the business for 20 yrs, and one of the first things I learned about appraisals was that comps should be comparing non-distressed properties with other non-distressed properties. That is, all the comps in any appraisal should be sales that were done “at arm’s length” with no special discounts, seller concessions, gifting, or heaven forbid, sheriff’s auctions, short sales, or REO sales (but banks are still trying to get market price for their foreclosed homes, and they don’t want them compared to other distressed sales either! Appraisals should compare apples and apples, and a distressed sale is a rotten tomato.
In the Myrtle Beach market, the appraisers routinely use all sales including foreclosures and short sales in all of their appraisals for houses or condos. It has been that way for a while. I have sellers who think it should be different but the banks are not going to loan $100k for a condo in a complex when there have been recent comparable sales in the same complex for $50k. Doesn’t make sense for the banks.
Paul — With all due deference to your 20 years experience, there is no way to exclude distressed properties when determining market value in this day and time. When distressed sales comprise 30%+ of the universe of homes sold — there is no separation any longer. A sale is a sale and comparative value MUST include that 1/3 of the market! In a perfect world, we could compare only pink houses to pink houses — but we ain’t there, my friend. Let’s pray that some practical relief is ahead, but we can’t pretend it’s better and expect clients to pretend too.
Mark has got it 100% correct.
By the way, I have always scoffed at the idea, that someone references their
“20 or 30 years in the business” as a way to justify their own beliefs.
It’s laughable, really. All it means is that for 20 or 30 odd years,
one has been incorrect and/or doing it wrong…just because one made money
selling homes or whatever it is one does, does not qualify one as being an
expert or even good. Especially in real estate!
Prior to the bubble and the bust, the majority of RE agents/brokers have
lived in a fantasy land. A positive aspect of the crash and housing depression
has been the awakening or realization for many in the business.
I do see many agents are beginning to come around and comprehend the numbers and methodologies behind the ‘sale’, which is a good thing for the business. Hopefully, more and more will learn from the down turn and remain more
grounded within the industry and not blow their own horns as to being the
so-called experts…just because of the “I’v been around before you were born” rhetoric and nonsense.
Paul,
That is the way it is supposed to work, but it is not working the way it is supposed to work.
Sorry crystal ball. I don’t agree with anything in RE inching up. People are broke. People are on their 2nd year of unemployement, and what will happen to them when it runs out? More homes lost. Banks are letting people stay in their homes longer now than every before with no payments, hoping the people will catch up and not loose their homes, since that banks have enough.
Sorry, my crystal ball says things are going to get much worse before getting better.
As long as we can agree Austin, TX is a smart city.
This statement is the first to render your article and arm-chair analysis
unreliable and not credible, period.
“After 14 months of job gains”
If you are simply relying on and buy into the BLS data (manipulated and falsely reported) then as an economists, your research and analysis skills are highly questionable.
The BLS changed the SA formula.
The BLS changed the long-term UE metric.
The BLS does not count those who dropped out of the labor force.
The BLS is full of BS. many people know this, apparently, except you.
The real U3 rate is above 11%. The real U6 rate is well above 22%.
There has NOT been 14 months of job gains.
I’m not sure where or what planet you live on, but it’s not earth.
Once again, it is the RE industry making claims and statements
that are a nothing more than laughable. This industry has got to be
one of the most deceptive, unreliable, rhetoric-driven businesses full
of BS’ers in the financial/banking sector.
The conclusions of this article are based on several cause-effect fallacies:
1. that economic recovery will lead to house price increases
2. that lower home prices hurt seller motivation
3. that economic recovery will bring construction jobs
Each of the above “causes” may affect the “results” in a minor way.
But none of these causes are the major reason leading to the stated results.
1. House prices are based on supply compared to demand. Period. House prices will recover when there are more buyers and fewer homes for sale.
2. In many cases, lower home prices make a house worth less than the debt against it so the sale must be a short sale. As prices continue to decline, more and more homes go underwater motivating more and more sellers to sell short or walk from their homes. This increases inventory, continuing the price decline which in turn pushes more home loans underwater motivating more sellers to default. That almost every seller now knows of other families living for free in their homes over a year, defaulting seems less onerous, perpetuating a vicious downward cycle.
3. home construction jobs have to compete with home sales. Home construction cannot compete, regardless of the economic job environment, at much less than $150-$200/sf. When homes are selling for $78/sf, as they are in Rochester, NY, it is highly unlikely construction will expand until home prices have risen high enough for new construction to compete. This will most likely take several more years.
Article Fact Correction: Loan delinquencies are down 16%, not 25%, from their peak in first quarter 2010. (7.35M down to 6.15M) That means over 6M loans are still in the delinquent pipeline. And this number does not include the underwater loans that are still performing (borrowers making their payments).
Missing Article Fact: The downward price pressure of distressed properties has now pushed 11M loans UNDERWATER, 25% of US loan inventory. This is seriously bad news. With 25% of the country’s loans secured by property valued at less than the loan, it is more likely than ever greater numbers of sellers will strategically default. This will lead to even more motivated short sellers furthering the collapse of real estate prices.
Missing Article Fact: Foreclosures and short sales have locked out 6 months to 3 years’ worth of buyers in many markets. This is why the omnipresent low mortgage rates have not and CANNOT motivate these buyers to buy. These buyers can’t get loans, regardless of the interest rate. Markets simply can’t and won’t recover until these buyers can buy again.
Hot Cities Fallacy: connecting home prices and new construction to a smart workforce and high-tech industry is a complete fallacy. These items have almost nothing to do with each other. But unless you really understand real estate, it sounds good, at least at first.
What this means for Agents: ignore this article’s conclusions. Work with me to keep sellers in their homes, bring buyers back to the market and make every city a “Hot City”. (http://occupy-our-homes.info/) A stable real estate market will lead to more buyer confidence, more lender confidence, more property tax revenues, and increased home prices. That will lead to more construction jobs and economic improvement. And that will improve every agent’s bottom line.
Thanks CJ for posting your comments, supply and demand is a basic law, fundemental, of economics. You have explained succinctly the vicious cycle of the housing market we are in. And detailed why this article is a total fluff piece created to provide false hope and optimisim.
I agree with you that more and more sellers will strategically default on thier loans which will drive prices down further.
All in all we are a long way from recovering from this housing mess.
And while, the succinctly demand-supply model is a factor, it is the core
economic drivers of housing and real estate that determine the trends of the supply-demand curve of housing assets. Simply stating that it’s a
supply v demand issue overlooks so many critical and key forces of economics.
The number one driver is the labor market, period. Without purchasing power
and borrowing ability, it would not matter if there were a limited supply.
While supply is a major factor with existing/new/distressed and shadow inventories, the inventory glut mainly accelerated due to lending restrictions,
rapid job losses, which then created extremely high unemployment.
Forget household formation, population growth and the natural inclination to ‘move up’ Wage stagnation and lack of moderate to higher paying jobs are scarce, which have been since 2008 and continue to be the key exerting forces on residential real estate.
Excellent!
Jed, has the credentials that mirrors what the government has been saying all along. We have been seeing modest growth in a stronger economy as we move out of the recession.
To date they are all in denile that the housing market is in a DEPRESSION!
We have seen NO GROWTH in over 4 years, even the NAR came out last week stating that there numbers were overstated in calculating the amount of FSBO and NEW CONSTRUCTION
Sold since 2007.
Do you really think that the economy and unemployment figures will improve without housing explosion? Without Double Digit growth a few consecutive
Interesting forecast. “Delinquencies will go down, but foreclosures will go up.”
With unemployment stuck in neutral, GDP YTD is under 2%, and according to Kiplinger.com, forecasts are for 2% or less, “roughly the same as in 2011, enough to avoid another recession but not enough to make much of a dent in unemployment.”
So if job improvement remains illusory, personal income will follow in tandem, and given no other reliable evidence to the contrary, that spells more delinquencies, not fewer. We are informed that banks are preparing to clear their balance sheets, which will result in fewer homeowners living for free in their home. Shortened foreclosure timeframes is either going to increase the number of short sales, or add to the number of foreclosures. (See foreclosureradar.com)
Read more: http://www.kiplinger.com/businessresource/economic_outlook/#ixzz1hn3YaDGe
Interesting…. I’ll run all of the above predictions through my magic 8-ball and see if I get the same results.
With all of the other Wild card factors taking place (vacant homes, homes in the foreclosure process) …. I’ll stick to Rent vs. Buy and Cash on Cash calculations.
Jed, has the credentials that mirrors what the government has been saying all along. We have been seeing modest growth in a stronger economy as we move out of the recession.
To date they are all in denile that the housing market is still in a DEPRESSION!
We have seen NO GROWTH in over 4 years, even the NAR came out last week stating that there numbers were overstated in calculating the amount of FSBO and NEW CONSTRUCTION
Sold since 2007.
Do you really think that the economy and unemployment figures will improve without a housing explosion? Without Double Digit growth for a 3 consecutive years Jed, housing won’t improve till 2020. The government has to relax the banking laws to encourage banks to give out mortgages freely. Than 8 million trades people associated with home building will be working again and the middle class will start spending money again. It would be a win win for everybody.
We have no confidence in the government and we hate the banks these days. So I took out an insurance policy on my family, after selling over $300 million in residetial Real Estate the last 10 years, $20 million in 2011. My wife is also a Realtor
we are both in our 60′s and dont have money to think about retiring.We reinvented ourselves and purchased a Metal Man Roofing Machine and started a company called Metal Roofing Arts. Have faith in God! One day at a time and don’t project the future.
With prices rolled back to 2003 levels, 30 yr fixed mortgage rates at 4.25% and the affordability index near historic highs, the fundamental message to buyers is to act now or risk missing out on, what can potentially be looked back on, as a once in a lifetime opportunity to afford to buy real estate.
Despite the media negativity over the past 4-5 yrs, the desire by people for homeownership, remains very much alive in the US.
Of course the “Desire” is there, that is a basic human condition. Consumption or the want of is NOT the issue Tony. A lot of RE agents and brokers miss the point.
It IS purchasing power and borrowing ability. Which, RELY on employment and employment stability. You know, making that statement,
…”a once in a lifetime opportunity to afford to buy real estate.”
That is typical fodder from within the business. So many RE people have little to no understanding of market forces and in-depth economics. There are so many factors in play as to why the RE industry is flat-lining. it’s not just one or two aspects. It is complex and was a result of very subversive and intricate financial manipulation and corruption.
We can pretend all we want. Home prices will go down, people will be paid less, and there will be less hours offered to employees to avoid full time players. I’ve seen it happen to my friends who work for large companies. Higher paid full time employees are a thing of the past. They are moving those people out to make room for lower paid people with little or no benifits…
The economic recovery is still not going in the right the direction. With the Government increasing the Debt ceiling to 16 Trillion Dollars, another increase in taxes is mostly likely our fate.
Buyers not qualifying for Mortgages, due to credit and lack of or too little down payments are increasing the rental demands of the housing market. Plus with numerous forclosures increasing, the rental market is “HOT!” Rental prices will continue to rise as those forced out of their homes by foreclosure are competing for rentals. However, I see more Landlords not renting to those foreclosed on due to their credit ratings, leaving those with forclosure’s severe damage to their credit, forced to be homeless. Investment properties will be the new Market for buyers that can afford to carry additional property mortgages or make cash purchases.
As a Real Estate Professional for the last 14 years, I’ve seen the Housing Market at its best and worked in 2 market areas in the country; Mid-West and now East Coast. Residential sales are no longer with multiple deal clients, now it “one & done!” Short sales are more frequent, (unless the bank decides to take it from the home owner and qualified buyer, killing the deal.) And now numerous Forclosures are sitting in bank inventory. If all of them were to flood the housing market, it would crash!
Multiple offers on House Sales are a thing of the past, now its multiple offers on Rent! For those lucky enough to be able to sell and get out of their upside down mortages (short sales,) then get into something smaller with little or no maintenance, rent seems more affordable.
Loan modifications were not fair to struggling home owners either. You literally had to re-qualify (like purchasing,) just to keep your home! It was just another way for banks to leagally steal your homes. By making unrealistic demands, with high payments and when you couldn’t, …take your homes!
Giving big businesses government money to stimulate the economy, as we’ve seen, was a huge mistake! The misuse of money by Banks led to buying each other and Upper Management lining their pockets!
If you really want to stimulate the economy, you need to stop putting small businesses Out of Business! Buy local, support your neighbors! I am an independent businesswoman! I live here, I work here, I shop here and my children are growing up here. My money stays right here, locally!
We have yet to see the bottom! We didn’t get here over night and it will take a lot longer to recover than it did to get this way. God Bless us!
Good insight Jenn. You are one of very few RE persons to see it for what it is.
Thanks all for the comments/conversation. Just wanted to let you know we’re reading and may address a few of them in the coming days. Until then, keep letting us know what you think. As well, these are our predictions. Feel free to let us know what you the year will bring (as some of you already have).
2 things come to mind that I never hear anyone mention: first, there are many hundreds if not thousands of home owners in just about any market that would love to sell their homes but are “waiting on the market to come back” so they will just hold off selling until then. This means that as soon as foreclosures slack off and the number of sales increase we will these folks putting their properties on the market and once again another glut of properties.
Another factor to consider is the Baby Boomers. They still comprise a huge part of the population and own the majority of homes. As more boomers retire they will be wanting to sell their homes to downsize or perhaps buy that monster motor home and hit the road for a few years. When they are ready to purchase: it will be a condo, small house, trailer in a retirement park or apartment at an assisted living facility. At any rate I don’t see there being enough younger people following behind them to purchase all those homes they are going to put on the market. I believe we will be seeing the effects of the boomers at about the time we think the market has recovered.
My crystal ball says the gravy train has left the station and is not scheduled for return anytime soon.
Linda Morgan, those were my thoughts too….baby boomers who hold property wanting to liquidate as market improves causing another glut.
Hey People-Take a listen to how Australia runs their government, one government for the better of the people, all must vote for THEIR laws and rights, wow what a concept! They have none of this Rooster stuff between parties. We need one government for the people not several going against each other. But again what our politicians/banks can not seem to have is a meeting of the minds acting like children and refusing to consider the people as they become richer while entertaining each others egos. It is sickening and in the mean time we all suffer along with the Real Estate market that is just a piece of the big picture, sorry to sadly say we have along way to go before seeing brighter days.
Crystal Balls don’t work; it all depends in the “Forutune Tellers”
Regards for helping out, wonderful info .